Sayonara to the Marinemaster - Seiko SBDX001 postmorten. Enjoy!

In site news, I've updated the Adaptivist Builder version to the current one, and am also trying a plugin for mobile browsers from refinedwiki

Let me know what you think of the mobile version - it's ten bucks, so if it works well I'm happy to buy it.

The IWC Aquatimer 2000 has proprietary lugs, and an overpriced strap. Here are some links as I research alternatives:

• ABP Paris can accommodate IWC, but justly famous for custom, pricy work. Not sure how much cheaper than IWC it'd be, though I could get one made to my design.
• Timenation has a nice post about custom straps, but no suggestions.
• It looks like there's a velcro strap available:

(Image credit: awo on TZUK)

(Image credit: awo on TZUK)

Hmm. From the discussion, it sounds like adding a normal strap to that adapter is difficult. And it's expensive. Hmm.

More as I learn it.

Update 8/31/10: ABP replied to my email and asked me to re-enquire in 'September.' Guess they're busy.

Right after the IWC news, I've written up a long post with initial lume data, pictures and comparison to the Marinemaster.
Enjoy!

Way back in March, I decided to start what's often called a 'grail quest' in watch geek forums. It's been about seven months now, and with all long projects the end isn't quite what I thought it would be initially. I'll be writing a review of the grail, watch postmortems and more, but this is just a news item and a bit of discussion.

The main goals for the quest were

• Reduce the watch count significantly. I had too many watches that I sorta liked, or didn't wear.
• Hold out for the best I can afford.
• Buy something comfortable, as I plan to wear it more often than not.
• Nice movement, ETA 2892 or better
• Durable materials and construction:
  • AR coated sapphire crystal
  • Ceramic bezel
  • Titanium or 316L case
• Good lume
• Not too flashy

You can see the candidates on this page, but my shortlist started narrowing towards

• Omega Planet Ocean, 42mm, black bezel and orange numbers, with bracelet.
• OWC MS-5517, version 3, with Soprod A-10, ceramic bezel, A/R crystal.

I started watching the for-sale forums on PMWF, WUS and TimeZone, as a good way to judge prices and availability. As of this month, a very nice Omega on bracelet is about $2100, so that was a good place to target, savings-wise.

As always, you can see my watch database, including previous watches, but I sold roughly 26 watches to get this:

Taaa-daa! IWC Aquatimer 2000 ref 3568-02, IWC 30110 movement (ETA 2892 base), amazing sapphire bezel, convex sapphire with dual-sided AR, etc, etc. Full review and first impression review in the works.

Some notes on the decision process and some notes:

• I saw one of this model go quickly for just under 3000 on WUS, and when one came up that was a) local to san diego and b) 2850, I knew what an opportunity it represented. Being able to try it on before buying was worth quite a bit to me.
• It didn't take that much longer to save the difference ($750) between the IWC and a Planet Ocean. I figure that if I sour on the IWC, I can sell it and buy an Omega for less, so no worries there.
• The last watch to sell was my SBDX001. The damage I did to the lugs ended up costing me quite a lot of sale value. Good-condition Marinemasters are going for 1500 or more; I got 800 net for mine. Ouch. Surface finish matters quite a lot, duh.
• The WUS sale board is an excellent place for deals. Very few hassles, recommended.
• Why not the OWC? Actually, I am going to get one, but Dan has had supplier issues and availability now looks like October. By then I should have funds saved for one of those; that'll make a killer beater stablemate for the IWC.

• Finally, via this thread, I finally found a link to a grey market dealer: http://www.authenticwatches.com/. Looks like about 25% off MSRP, if the PO42 is indicative. I've always wondered about grey market; now I've seen one!
  That's this one:
  
  (Image credit: AuthenticWatches)
  Still my favorite PO and the top of my One Watch List.
• Via this thread, a nice explanation of AR coatings. Nice diagram, too:

(Image credit: http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/index-166.html)
I'll use it to update the AR coatings page (Done)

Items and snippets of interest:

• More reluming kits and instructions at Noctilumina, via this thread on DIY. The WUS thread has some nice pictures of how to create pseudo-patinated lume by adding graphite shavings.
• This WUS ad led me to this watchmaker site. It's a manual pressure tester for watches, which is on my list of instruments to buy. Check this out, though - the WUS ad shows this:

From the filename, 909cn, I found on labanda. They show the missing bits:

Not quite as cool when you see that you have to foot-pump it!

Still might be worth a try.

• Older, but check out this article via WUS on 'China, the World's Watchmaker.'

Had to update Theme Builder, and the flexi-blog-posts macro seems to be broken, sorry...

Dating site OK Cupid has a blog, where they often discuss interesting results from their subscribers. I saw a post recently that gelled some thoughts I'd been having about watches. How are they related, you ask?

This is no fun to type, but a big part of why people buy watches is to demonstrate their success, and thus their attractiveness as a mate. Economists and evolutionary biologists call it 'signalling' or signalling theory while sociologists call it 'lekking.'

Simply put, that Rolex you bought is a way of saying that you'd make a good mate, because you are accomplished and high-status. Pure and simple. (See 'dishonest signals'. Or honest ones.)

But why do men do this, you ask? As OK Cupid explained, because it works:

We did a little investigating as to whether a person's stated income had any real effect on his or her online dating experience. Unsurprisingly, we found that it matters a lot, particularly for men. This is a by-age messaging distribution:
...
These bold colors contain a subtle message: if you're a young guy and don't make much money, cool. If you're 23 or older and don't make much money, go die in a fire. It's not hard to see where the incentive to exaggerate comes from.

Simply put, rich men get the dates, end of story. Given that motivation, an expensive watch is probably somewhat effective, as long as the brand is recognizable as such. Heavily marketed and advertised brands no doubt figured this out ages ago.

The story gets more complicated. A post today points out that signals often have an audience, in that more wealthy consumers pick subtler signals, as they really don't care if the poorer notice them; the audience is their peers. Makes sense.

Rather than rely on obvious logos, expensive products use more discreet markers, such as distinctive design or detailing. High-end consumers prefer markers of status that are not decipherable by the mainstream. These signal group identity only to others with the connoisseurship to recognize their insider standing.

As wikipedia puts it:

Females come to these arenas to choose mates when the males' hierarchy has become established, and preferentially mate with the dominants in the centre.

Before this, I used to convince myself that less-common watches like my Stowa weren't signalling; my ego loses that battle and I probably have to concede that I'm just signalling to a very small audience of other otakus.

Sigh.

Watch is the Seiko SBDX001 'Marinemaster', charge from the UV lamp. Data looks freakin' fantastic:

In other news, I'm taking data as I type with the MicroSet.. Slow progress, but still moving forward.

P.S. What does the lume data mean? Ahh, I'll get back to you on that. The analytical framework needs some more effort on my part.